To consider the recommendations of the Response and Recovery Committee meeting on 16 February 2021 as set out in Appendix A attached (with reference to the Budget Pack circulated as a separate document to all Members).
To enable the Council to approve the budget and set the Council Tax for 2021/22, Members considered a report (at Appendix A of the agenda), in association with the ‘Budget Report 2021/22 to 2024/25’ pack which had been published and circulated separately to Members.
The Budget Report pack included detailed information in the following Annexes:
? Annex 01 - Budget Risk 2021-22,
? Annex 02 - Reconciliation between original budget 2020_21 and proposed budget 2021_22,
? Annex 03 - Statutory Council Tax Calculation 2021-22,
? Annex 04 - Parking, Bus Lanes & Moving Traffic 2020-21,
? Annex 05 - RBK Budget Growth 2021-22 - amended,
? Annex 06 - RBK Budget Savings 2021-22 to 2024-25 - amended,
? Annex 07 - Summary of 2021-22 Budget by Service,
? Annex 08 - Summary of 2021-22 Budget by expenditure type,
? Annex 09 - Flexible Use of Capital Receipts Strategy 2021-22,
? Annex 10 HRA BUDGET REPORT 2021-22,
? Annex 11 - Kingston Capital Strategy 2021-25,
? Annex 11 - Enclosure 1 - Capital Programme 2021-22-2024-25 (2021-22),
? Annex 12 - RBK Treasury Strategy 2021-25,
? Annex 13 - RBK Pay Policy Statement 2021-22,
? Annex 14 - RBK Schools Budget 2021-22,
? Annex 14 - Enclosure 1 - Schools Budget 2021-22,
? Annex 14 - Enclosure 2 - Schools Budget 2021-22,
? Annex 14 - Enclosure 3 - Schools Budget 2021-22,
? Updated Annex 03 - Statutory Council Tax Calculation 2021-22 (as set out in the published late material),
Key features of the 2021/22 Budget proposals were:
· Growth and investment in services to meet the Council’s key priorities and demand pressures of £11.535m
· The identification of £7.415m of revenue savings, of which £3.093m were as a direct result of the Transformation programme.
· An average Council Tax at band D of £1,693.57, a 1.99% increase in the Council Tax set by Kingston Council and a 3% increase in the Adult Social Care precept.
· A general fund reserve of £19.633m for 2021/22 was held at the level of this year’s figure with no increase applied.
· A Capital Programme to provide infrastructure investment in Kingston. The general fund capital programme over four years from 2021/22 would be £113.3m.
Members noted that the Budget was designed to support the Council in meeting the significant challenges it faced in ensuring services for its residents and some of the most vulnerable communities were protected against a backdrop of increasing demand in terms of volume and complexity, decreasing resources available to fund those services and the ongoing financial challenges brought about by the Covid-19 pandemic.
The Executive Director, Corporate and Communities had been authorised by the Response and Recovery Committee to make any necessary changes to the GLA precept in the Council Tax Calculation (Annex A) (which might arise from the GLA Budget meeting on 25 February) prior to submission to Budget Council. However, Late Material circulated prior to the Council meeting reported that, in the event, the GLA budget had been approved without amendment and therefore no amendments to the Council Tax calculation in Annex A were necessary. The Late Material also confirmed that the final local government finance settlement for 2021/22 had included no changes to the provisional figures which had been included in the budget report pack.
(1) In order for the proposals to be presented in detail at the Council meeting by the Portfolio Holder for Finance and Commissioning, Councillor Andreas Kirsch (in place of the Leader of the Council), in accordance with Procedure Rule 16 (1), it was Resolved that Procedure Rule 10 (12) be suspended to allow the Portfolio Holder to speak for longer than 4 minutes.
(2) Councillor Andreas Kirsch proposed and the Leader of the Council, Councillor Caroline Kerr, seconded the recommendations to the Council set out in the report at Appendix A to the agenda.
(3) Councillor Sharron Falchikov-Sumner proposed an amendment (with accompanying comments from the Section 151 Officer), which was seconded by the Leader of the Opposition, Councillor Kevin Davis, as follows:
The pandemic has been difficult for everyone - many local people have lost jobs, been furloughed or faced financial uncertainty. Children have similarly faced a year of disrupted education, anxiety and isolation from friends and wider family.
The evidence which shows it is the poorest in our community that have been hit hardest. The BMJ (https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n376) wrote (21 February 2021):
Containment and lockdown measures have disproportionately affected low income families with young children. Recent research identified the extra costs involved in having children at home for longer without access to vital free services, requiring increased spending on food, heating, and occupying children indoors. Over a third of low income families with children increased their spending during 2020, while 40% of high income families without children reduced theirs.
That councillors and senior officers have been more insulated from these financial concerns with guaranteed incomes and no threat of losing their livelihoods unlike the poorest families in our borough.
The amazing way our borough (and the communities that make it up) has pulled together during this pandemic and we thank every person, family, community group and business for their compassion, grit and reliance during the last 12 months.
By each of the community leaders here tonight making a small sacrifice (by way of our above inflation pay increases) we can pool this money together and help some of the boroughs children recover from the anxiety and isolation of lockdown.
We have a duty to protect the poorest and most vulnerable in our borough.
As we look forward to the end of the pandemic we need targeted action to deal with its longer term effects on the poorest children in our borough - particularly on their educational achievement and mental health. Children living in families without the financial strength to have proper home learning through lack of IT or broadband are also likely to be the ones living in accommodation with the least access to open space and will have disproportionately lost out on learning and have suffered the greatest mental health impacts as a result.
Therefore Council calls for:
1. A freeze on councillor allowances in 2021/22.
2. A freeze on senior officer pay for 2021/2022– defined as officers holding the rank of assistant director and above.
3. The £41,500 raised by the above measures to be allocated equally between the four Neighbourhood Committee (£10,375 each) to create a fund for use in supporting school aged children who have experienced mental health problems or educational disadvantage during the pandemic.
4. Each neighbourhood to proactively invite applications from affected families, community organisations and individuals, local charities and self help groups for small grants to provide equipment, events or help services for school aged children to help them reintegrate back into their educational settings.’
(4) The Mayor adjourned the meeting to allow the Council to consider the amendment. On the Council reconvening, the Mayor exercised discretion to waive the limit to allow more than 10 speakers in the ensuing discussion.
(5) After debate, the amendment was put to the vote and was declared defeated –
For: 1 Member of the Council (Councillor Sharron Falchikov-Sumner)
Against: 35 Members of the Council (The Mayor, Councillor Margaret Thompson, and Councillors Zain Abbas, Sushila Abraham, Stephanie Archer, Kim Bailey,
Mark Beynon, Fiona Boult, Olivia Boult, Tim Cobbett, Emily Davey, Lorraine Dunstone, Mark Durrant, Simon Edwards, Sam Foulder-Hughes, Hilary Gander,
Dennis Goodship, Liz Green, Jaesung Ha, Lesley Heap, Alison Holt, Caroline Kerr, Andreas Kirsch, Katrina Lidbetter, Rebekah Moll, Munir Ravalia, Dave Ryder-Mills, Anita Schaper, Malcolm Self, John Sweeney, Thay Thayalan, Jon Tolley, Diane White, Annette Wookey, Yogan Yoganathan and Sharon Young.)
Abstaining: 10 Members of the Council (Councillors Roy Arora, Rowena Bass,
David Cunningham, Kevin Davis, Ed Fram, Ian George, Jason Hughes, Maria Netley, Nicola Sheppard and Olly Wehring)
(6) The recommendations set out in the report at Appendix A to the agenda were put to the meeting and, after further debate, it was:
[References to ‘the report’* are to the report at Annex 1 to Appendix A in the Council agenda pack. Other references are to the Budget Report Pack.]
1. the budget proposals and Council Tax for 2021/22 as set out in the Budget Report Pack report and annexes, be approved.
2. the relevant officers to take necessary action to deliver the agreed budget and service changes, including increasing relevant fees and charges in line with inflation, be authorised.
3. in accordance with the requirements of the Local Government Act 2003, the comments of the Executive Director, Corporate and Communities in regard to the robustness of estimates and the level of reserves and balances as set out in the section “Comments of the Executive Director, Corporate and Communities (S151 Officer) ” in paragraphs 24 to 33 of the Budget Report Pack, be noted;
4. in accordance with sections 32 to 36 of the Local Government Act 1992, the amounts in the statutory Council Tax calculation, Annex 3 of the Budget Report pack) for the financial year 2021/22 be calculated;
5. the Capital Strategy including the detailed capital programme for 2021/22 to 2024/25 as set out in Annex 11 to the Budget Report and the Treasury Strategy including the Annual Investment Strategy, prudential indicators and the Minimum Revenue Provision (MRP) policy as set out in Annex 12 to the Budget Report, be approved;
6. the HRA 2021-22 base budget and proposal for growth and savings as set out in Annex 10 of the Budget Report Pack, be approved;
7. the pay policy at Annex 13 to the budget report, be approved;
8. the Schools Budget for 2021-22 in line with paragraph 16 and Enclosure 1 of Annex 14 to this report, be approved;
9. the proposals outlined for the Central School Services Block (ref. paras 25-27) of Annex 14 to this report), be approved;
10. the proposals outlined for the Early Years Block including the transfer of £162k to the High Needs Block (ref. paras. 28 - 33) of Annex 14 to this report), be approved;
11. the proposals for the High Needs Block (outlined in Annex 14 paras. 34-37), be approved;
12. the proposals outlined for the Schools Block (ref. paras 19-24 of Annex 14) and the Schools Funding Formula outlined in Enclosure 2 of Annex 14 and the Schools Allocations in Enclosure 3 of Annex 14 be approved, including a Minimum Funding Guarantee of +0.5% per pupil (ref. paras 21-22 of Annex 14), be approved.
For: 36 Members of the Council (The Mayor, Councillor Margaret Thompson, and Councillors Zain Abbas, Sushila Abraham, Stephanie Archer, Kim Bailey, Mark Beynon, Fiona Boult, Olivia Boult, Tim Cobbett, Emily Davey, Lorraine Dunstone, Mark Durrant, Simon Edwards, Sam Foulder-Hughes, Hilary Gander, Dennis Goodship, Liz Green, Jaesung Ha, Lesley Heap, Alison Holt, Caroline Kerr, Andreas Kirsch, Katrina Lidbetter, Rebekah Moll, Munir Ravalia, Dave Ryder-Mills, Anita Schaper, Malcolm Self, John Sweeney, Thay Thayalan, Jon Tolley, Olly Wehring, Diane White, Annette Wookey,
YoganYoganathan and Sharon Young.)
Against: 9 Members of the Council (Councillors Roy Arora, Rowena Bass,
David Cunningham, Kevin Davis, Ed Fram, Ian George, Jason Hughes, Maria Netley and Nicola Sheppard)
Abstaining: 1 Member of the Council (Councillor Sharron Falchikov-Sumner)